Samsung 530U3C/530U4C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 530U3C/530U4C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 530U3C/530U4C
Memory2.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120404
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 15:37
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 48.6
34% 47.5 Pts
4-Core 72
8-Core 81.9
10% 76.9 Pts
64-Core 80
5% 80 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D7) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.72% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 2.6
3% 2.5 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.72%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 50 58 56 54 56 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.3% Poor
Read 116
Write 59.7
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 55.3
17% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 10.4
28% 9.27 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 47.2
DQ Mixed 8.2
29% 65.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 78%
Sandisk i100 24GB
22GB free
Firmware: CS.51.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 71 73 77 72 78 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.8% Poor
Read 280
Write 79.8
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 74.7
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 6.4
27% 8.23 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 11.9
11% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5673FH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
29.6% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 530U3C/530U4C Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3C/530U4C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback