Fujitsu ESPRIMO E700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E700  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3061-A1
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 12:50
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 149
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 202
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11B9) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S4200102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 449 452 452 285 214 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 443
Mixed 423
SusWrite 382
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 43.5
141% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 181
184% 297 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 103%
Great: 128%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
51GB free
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 42 43 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 39.9
Write 39.9
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 41.9
29% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 RMR1810EC58E8F1333 HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 RMR1810EC58E8F1333 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 13.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 10.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO E700 Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback