HP 110-511nd

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 110-511nd  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B2C
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '22 at 18:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 183
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 350
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 2B2C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.5
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 93 92 99 92 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 251
Write 151
Mixed 179
SusWrite 94.2
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 41.7
133% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 124
96% 129 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
800GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 183 182 183 183 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 146
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 181
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 9905584-015.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.4
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 110-511nd Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 110-511nd

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback