ECS A320-SF110

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemECS LIVA ONE A320
MotherboardECS A320-SF110  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '22 at 09:07
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 62.3
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 147
55% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 281
37% 276 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.2.2
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 7.8
5% 7.23 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 11.3
7% 7.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD_M.2_PCI_NVME_256GB_InnovationIT 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1102A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 321 331 330 300 243 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1,233
Write 899
Mixed 711
SusWrite 300
175% 786 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 22.6
142% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 515
DQ Mixed 213
226% 369 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 129%
Great: 182%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA266.M8FR 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320-SF110 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A320-SF110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback