HP h8-1160t

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP h8-1160t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB5
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111012
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 05 '22 at 00:11
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 162
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 424
44% 353 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
EVGA(3842 3658) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 27.6
16% 23.5 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 22.5
21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 218 251 218 253 245 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 409
Write 249
Mixed 247
SusWrite 235
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 11.6
48% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 70.3
DQ Mixed 79.2
62% 87.7 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 129%
Samsung Spinpoint F3R 1TB
52GB free
Firmware: 1AJ30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 76 71 78 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 121
Write 136
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 75.7
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.3
261% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 78%
Samsung Spinpoint F3R 1TB
225GB free
Firmware: 1AJ30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 107 104 94 104 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 105
Write 107
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 102
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1
259% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 78%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
355GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 86 89 81 89 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 100
Write 97.6
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 85.8
65% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 96%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
44GB free
Firmware: 9128
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 79 91 81 92 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 96.9
Write 90.6
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 86
63% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1
309% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 101%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
52GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 21 0 12 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 76.2
Write 50.3
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 24.2
53% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 53%
WD My Book 1140 1TB
333GB free, PID 1140
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 92 96 85 96 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 95
Write 89
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 91.2
115% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 48%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
11GB free, PID 1140
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 73 78 86 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 109
Write 103
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 77.6
118% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 59%
WD My Book Elite 1TB
48GB free, PID 1111
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 30 27 30 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 36.9
Write 28.5
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 28.4
40% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1160t Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1160t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $286
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback