Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X432FLC_S432FL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X432FLC_S432FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X432FLC
Memory0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 504 x 1000 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 04 '22 at 21:51
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 30%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 116
53% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 232
26% 207 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX250
Asus(1043 15FF) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1179
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 16.1
16% 17.6 fps
MRender 17.8
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 13.4
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 209 205 196 191 179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 462
Write 437
Mixed 436
SusWrite 234
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 26.9
86% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 298
210% 269 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.6% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 14.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X432FLC_S432FL Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X432FLC_S432FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback