Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '22 at 20:38
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 95.4 1-Core 137 2-Core 249 91% 161 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 664 70% 561 Pts	64-Core 735 46% 735 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2797 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	118% Outstanding	Lighting 156 Reflection 180 Parallax 167 128% 168 fps	MRender 131 Gravity 166 Splatting 121 112% 139 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 107GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0.00 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,702 Write 2,472 Mixed 2,268 553% 2,481 MB/s	4K Read 67.3 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 94.2 307% 107 MB/s	DQ Read 1,465 DQ Write 1,180 DQ Mixed 1,262 961% 1,302 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 163%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 130% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2523 2530 2523 2521 2514 2504 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	419% Outstanding	Read 2,722 Write 2,550 Mixed 2,282 SusWrite 2,520 567% 2,518 MB/s	4K Read 63.8 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 92.3 300% 105 MB/s	DQ Read 1,568 DQ Write 1278 DQ Mixed 1,394 1,051% 1,413 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 419% Great: 181%
General USB Flash Disk 2GB 193 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 8003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	4.12% Terrible	Read 16.2 Write 5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 3.6 8% 7.25 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.12% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 7,409 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	MC Read 36.1 MC Write 37.9 MC Mixed 30.3 99% 34.8 GB/s	SC Read 22.3 SC Write 41.7 SC Mixed 30.9 90% 31.6 GB/s	Latency 56 71% 56 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1,007x
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	95x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	62x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	254x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	199x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	96x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	51x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	47x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	60x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	42x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,133

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16