TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP 870-245qe

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 870-245qe  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 830C
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime14 Days
Run DateMar 04 '22 at 19:31
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 254
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 497
65% 489 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 88.2%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.07
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.4% Above average
Lighting 62.5
Reflection 66
Parallax 60.3
51% 62.9 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 60.7
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 51.4%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
767GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 84 63 120 113 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 160
Write 149
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 104
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 75.7%
 Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
662GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 135 134 136 137 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 125
Write 105
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 135
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 74.9%
 Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.1% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 21.7
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 71.1%
 Great: 75%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 870-245qe Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: HP 870-245qe

CPU
Core i5-7600KIntel  $170Bench 76%, 195,006 samples11x
Core i7-7700KIntel  $249Bench 84%, 712,312 samples2x
GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples13x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples3x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples2x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples2x
RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 82%, 74,390 samples3x
CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 029E CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 24GBUnknownBench 69%, 2 samples2x
4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 2x4GBMicronBench 63%, 3,242 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback