Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '22 at 03:41
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 141
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 343
37% 294 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.5% Poor
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 88.7
3% 37.7 fps
MRender 92.9
Gravity 67.7
Splatting 73.5
63% 78 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUS 722T1TALA604 1TB
566GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RAGN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 166 165 162 164 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 138
Write 204
Mixed 150
SusWrite 166
122% 165 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.9
456% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 97%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
623GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 102 97 107 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 83.8
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 103
62% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 18.3
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P FX Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback