Lenovo 30BBS27900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 30BBS27900  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1037
Memory75.2 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180620
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '22 at 21:57
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6128
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 65.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 192
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 451
52% 403 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3480) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21% Poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 28.4
17% 26.8 fps
MRender 29.7
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 25.2
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 21%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G-1001 512GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10130101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,095
Write 836
Mixed 841
205% 924 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 32.8
107% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 581
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 590
445% 592 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 264%
Samsung 860 2TB
89GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 337 333 345 330 329 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 358
Write 308
Mixed 310
SusWrite 335
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 32.6
102% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 314
233% 309 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43BB1-CTD 6x16GB
6 of 12 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 68
MC Mixed 38.2
130% 45.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 7
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 109%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30BBS27900 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

System: Lenovo 30BBS27900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback