Samsung R528/R728/R538

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSamsung R528/R728/R538  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R528/R728/R538
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100621
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 03 '22 at 14:48
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 108
48% 78.8 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 155
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C06A) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2104
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.9
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.1
1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$40
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 66 66 56 61 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 71.3
Write 79.5
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 57.2
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5773CHS-CF8 85E3 53634xxxx68x6406xx 4GB
533, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.1% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.9
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R528/R728/R538 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R528/R728/R538

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback