To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180807
Uptime10 Days
Run DateMar 03 '22 at 11:27
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 185
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 686
59% 507 Pts
64-Core 872
54% 872 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.8 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 77 55 56 56 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 38.6
Write 340
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 64
26% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 5.3
17% 7.73 MB/s
DQ Read 58.3
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 165
103% 112 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
225GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 134 137 136 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 150
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 136
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF51272PZ- 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
77.4% Very good
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 26.4
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback