Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 03 '22 at 08:52
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 66.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 277
85% 160 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 952
89% 740 Pts
64-Core 1,471
91% 1,471 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 69.8
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 93.2
57% 75.4 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 75.7
Splatting 47.1
50% 62.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$129
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 405 359 359 386 402 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 426
Mixed 401
SusWrite 385
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 51.2
168% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 127
116% 177 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 105%
Great: 126%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 159
Write 165
Mixed 128
SusWrite 41.1
161% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 65%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 186
Write 149
Mixed 89.4
SusWrite 0.4
127% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA HDWG21C 12TB
7.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.4% Below average
Read 220
Write 220
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 0.2
154% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
874GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 39.9
Write 39.3
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 40.6
52% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
66.9% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.7
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 27
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,944 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $25

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $850
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback