QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 03 '22 at 07:27
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 165
57% 102 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 676
60% 508 Pts
64-Core 990
61% 990 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 69GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 727
Write 635
Mixed 706
154% 689 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 13.3
52% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 241
185% 253 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 72%
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
226GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 216 209 210 207 211 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 405
Write 276
Mixed 221
SusWrite 213
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 16.1
52% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 161
148% 228 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 36.7
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.5
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback