ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 30A6S03N00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	25% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Lenovo 30A6S03N00 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150604
Uptime	16 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '22 at 20:08
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 7,962 User benchmarks, average bench 77% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 91.3 1-Core 106 2-Core 207 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 683 67% 547 Pts	64-Core 821 51% 821 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 67 51 75 75 68 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25% Poor	Read 182 Write 85.7 Mixed 81.3 SusWrite 83.1 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 19.5 4K Mixed 9.4 40% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 14.2 DQ Write 15.4 DQ Mixed 14.3 11% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 156GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 204 311 226 75 5.6 MB/s Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.5% Above average	Read 196 Write 94.7 Mixed 84.7 SusWrite 186 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 32.2 70% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 209 179% 259 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9965589-037.D00G 2x8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	65.9% Good	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 20.5 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 18.9 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback