Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 23 months ago.
SystemDell Precision T3600
MotherboardDell Precision T3600  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 19:52
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-4650L 0
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 148
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 469
46% 377 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 121 136 142 147 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 476
Write 366
Mixed 331
SusWrite 148
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 30.6
114% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 198
162% 238 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 115%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 3100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.7 8.3 8.4 8.3 9.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
7.01% Terrible
Read 27.9
Write 9.2
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 8.3
16% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.01%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix-00AD HMT42GR7CMR4A-G7 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,877 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback