Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics61.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 08:26
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$179
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 85.7
1-Core 172
2-Core 345
107% 201 Pts
4-Core 661
8-Core 1,092
107% 877 Pts
64-Core 1,558
96% 1,558 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Nvidia(10DE 2187) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.1% Good
Lighting 79.2
Reflection 80.2
Parallax 77
64% 78.8 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 75.2
Splatting 61.4
54% 66.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Innovation IT 240GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 2.6 66 27 9.1 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 476
Write 403
Mixed 368
SusWrite 75.9
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 0.7
46% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 0.7
15% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 92%
OOS1000G 1TB
90GB free
Firmware: OOS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 104 105 107 106 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 143
Write 141
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 106
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
232% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 110%
Intenso Alu Line 4GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 7.7 5.1 8.2 6.7 7.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 4.7
Mixed 4
SusWrite 7
8% 6.97 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 33.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 29.1
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 36.8
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $758
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback