Metabox P7xxTM1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics95.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMetabox P7xxTM1  (all builds)
MotherboardMETABOX P7xxTM1 powered by premamod.com
Memory123.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 03:30
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$269
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 80.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 288
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 997
95% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,352
84% 1,352 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Clevo(1558 7510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 114
Parallax 119
92% 115 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 111
Splatting 99.2
102% 129 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 30GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 16 11 0.2 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
8.34% Terrible
Read 20.4
Write 14.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 8.2
10% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.34%
Great: 58%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22.4
Write 15.1
Mixed 19.2
23% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
40% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 24.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7xxTM1 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Metabox P7xxTM1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $269
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback