Asus X705UV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus X705UV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X705UV
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '22 at 20:43
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 186
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 255
35% 259 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 149E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 10
Parallax 7
5% 7.77 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 374 368 362 173 366 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 459
Write 368
Mixed 362
SusWrite 334
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 13.4
97% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 27.2
81% 169 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 859B CT4G4SFS824A.C8FG 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.8% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X705UV Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X705UV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback