HP 20-b013w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 20-b013w  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AF0
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 01 '22 at 17:19
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Memory 35.6
1-Core 8.5
2-Core 24.7
17% 22.9 Pts
4-Core 13.7
8-Core 14.1
2% 13.9 Pts
64-Core 14.3
1% 14.3 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
HP(103C 2AF0) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.83% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.27 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.83%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 29 27 25 19 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 31.8
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 28
20% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
59% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 4985 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
6.95% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 1.9
MC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.3 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 0.6
3% 0.9 GB/s
Latency 224
18% 224 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 6.95%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20-b013w Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 20-b013w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback