Lenovo 20HUS02100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20HUS02100  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HUS02100
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170511
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMar 01 '22 at 14:18
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 27%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 78.1
2-Core 141
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 244
34% 251 Pts
64-Core 249
15% 249 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 5065) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.84% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.4
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.84%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1001 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4133001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 96 97 100 99 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 465
Write 331
Mixed 312
SusWrite 114
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 44.9
160% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 225
192% 283 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 11.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20HUS02100 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20HUS02100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback