Lenovo 90JL0036MW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 90JL0036MW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36E7
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '22 at 08:13
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 686
73% 584 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
MSI(1462 3511) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.39
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.1% Poor
Lighting 32.8
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 32.9
27% 33.5 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 33.6
Splatting 23.5
25% 31.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmt128g TOSHIBA 128GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0109ADLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 185 140 175 188 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 589
Write 248
Mixed 286
SusWrite 174
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 23.7
125% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 61.6
DQ Mixed 61.9
84% 164 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 131%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
834GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 185 186 181 178 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 145
Mixed 98.9
SusWrite 183
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C17-8GNT Ramaxel RMUA5110ME78HAF-2666 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 24.3
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 24.2
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90JL0036MW Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90JL0036MW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback