Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600S-$235 3,026 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 96.8 2-Core 189 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 385 43% 337 Pts	64-Core 385 24% 385 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0494) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.19% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 1.3 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 3 2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.19% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 87 85 77 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 177 Write 117 Mixed 142 SusWrite 84.8 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 25.3 87% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 26.5 DQ Write 85.3 DQ Mixed 29.7 30% 47.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GB 13,765 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.1% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 16.4 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.1 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	24x
HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 8,807 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
KingFast 512GBBench 79%, 3,625 samples	2x

RAM
GU6C2303EP0200 2x2GBUnifosaBench 47%, 36 samples	4x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	2x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	2x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16