HP 630 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP 630 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3674
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111107
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 18:22
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 116
48% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 145
20% 146 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 45%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 70 48 65 72 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 76
Write 66
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 63.9
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 43%
MEDIATEK FLASH DISK 4GB
4GB free, PID 0002
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Read 0.8
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.5
1% 0.57 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.4% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 630 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 630 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $35SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback