Fujitsu CELSIUS W5010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics91.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W5010  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3817-A1
Memory55.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 17:36
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
CPU1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 86.4
1-Core 153
2-Core 302
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 1,166
104% 880 Pts
64-Core 1,964
122% 1,964 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.8% Outstanding
Lighting 109
Reflection 123
Parallax 114
89% 116 fps
MRender 157
Gravity 95.3
Splatting 110
97% 121 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
821GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2115 1959 1472 1475 1447 1450 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,208
Write 2,299
Mixed 1797
SusWrite 1,653
448% 1,989 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 83.7
262% 88.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,165
DQ Write 991
DQ Mixed 1,116
826% 1,091 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 319%
Great: 355%
Seagate ST2000NM000A-2J2100 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: TN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 220 223 222 222 223 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A4G43AB2-CVF 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 27.4
90% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 23.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W5010 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W5010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $430
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback