Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 14:10
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 242
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 688
73% 584 Pts
64-Core 670
42% 670 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.4% Average
Lighting 53.6
Reflection 79.1
Parallax 49.6
44% 60.8 fps
MRender 41.5
Gravity 49.4
Splatting 44.2
37% 45 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 240GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 209 115 76 53 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 464
Write 290
Mixed 236
SusWrite 125
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 18.3
42% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 37.5
DQ Write 49
DQ Mixed 161
88% 82.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
839GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 88 89 89 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 162
Write 14.5
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 88
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 109%
Mass Storage Device 8GB
6GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 10 10 10 6.4 7.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
7.52% Terrible
Read 18.4
Write 10.2
Mixed 9.9
SusWrite 8.8
15% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
72% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.52%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3200 2OZ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
45.4% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 12.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 14.6
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 4R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 10% 118 290 197 120 24" 1920 1080 DELD0E1 S2419HGF
History: Score 4: 0R 1G 1B | Score 36: 4R 4G 4B
Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback