ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gbt___ AWRDACPI

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gbt___ AWRDACPI (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte 8I915P Duo
Memory	2.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20051124
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 28 '22 at 13:09
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz 6,937 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.25 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Memory 62 1-Core 29.1 2-Core 33.4 31% 41.5 Pts	4-Core 33.4 8-Core 33.5 4% 33.5 Pts	64-Core 33.8 2% 33.8 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5450 (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20) 74 User benchmarks, average bench 1% XFX(1682 3030) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.99% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.63 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.99% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 128GB 2,222 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN07373 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 114 112 111 117 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.2% Below average	Read 121 Write 120 Mixed 118 SusWrite 111 26% 117 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 21.5 78% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 23.9 DQ Write 41.9 DQ Mixed 25 21% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 4.6 14% 4.83 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 5.4 14% 5.07 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical AWRDACPI Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 15%

Tree trunk

Workstation

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Gbt___ AWRDACPI

CPU
Pentium 4 3.00GHzIntelBench 29%, 6,937 samples	11x
Pentium D 3.40GHzIntelBench 32%, 3,806 samples	7x
Pentium D 3.20GHzIntel $100Bench 31%, 938 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce 6200NvidiaBench 0%, 1,060 samples	4x
Radeon X1300AMDBench 0%, 685 samples	3x
GeForce 7600 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 1,208 samples	3x

SSD
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	3x
BX500 240GBCrucial $27Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x
XPG SX900 128GBAdata $103Bench 68%, 6,500 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	11x
2GBUnknownBench 15%, 9,823 samples	6x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback