Panasonic CFSZ5-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPanasonic CFSZ5-2  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFSZ5-2
Memory3.3 GB free of 8.01562 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime14.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 12:09
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 151
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 204
27% 205 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 54%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 5.3
4% 4.33 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 5
Splatting 8.2
5% 6.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 263 272 256 275 276 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 442
Write 288
Mixed 234
SusWrite 263
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 31
124% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 229
196% 291 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 56GB
1867, 1867, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
63.2% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 20.8
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 19.3
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CFSZ5-2 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CFSZ5-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback