Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Memory 46.5 1-Core 53.5 2-Core 105 40% 68.3 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 201 27% 203 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 506E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.78% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 2.4 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.9 2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.78% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmt128g TOSHIBA 128GB 5,624 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0108ADLA Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 429 Write 251 Mixed 351 76% 344 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 36.4 118% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 267 205% 280 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 131%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 2x4GB 3,234 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.7% Poor	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 10.9 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	1x

SSD
TOSHIBA 128GBKbg30zmt128gBench 83%, 5,624 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBMicronBench 68%, 3,234 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $47	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16