Digibras NM70-I

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Digibras NM70-I (all builds)
Motherboard	Digiboard NM70-I
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121130
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 27 '22 at 20:14
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 847-$259 3,990 User benchmarks, average bench 34% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	40% Below average	Memory 71.6 1-Core 28.2 2-Core 47.9 36% 49.2 Pts	4-Core 52.2 8-Core 55.2 7% 53.7 Pts	64-Core 52.8 3% 52.8 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% PNY(196E 0984) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.04 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22% Poor	Lighting 23.2 Reflection 31 Parallax 41.5 19% 31.9 fps	MRender 40.3 Gravity 33.2 Splatting 31 28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 368GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX002V SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 85 90 91 84 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 105 Write 66.2 Mixed 34 SusWrite 89.1 54% 73.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 32GB 4,876 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 27GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.2 3.6 3 4.6 1.8 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	8.46% Terrible	Read 26.2 Write 5.5 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 3.3 10% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 2.1 119% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.46% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Smart SH5641G8FJ8NWRNSQR 1x8GB 1,144 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.5% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.57 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.7 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 97.8 41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NM70-I Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Digibras NM70-I

CPU
Celeron 847Intel $259Bench 34%, 3,990 samples	10x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	9x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	1x

SSD
P3-128 128GBBench 63%, 3,189 samples	1x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	1x

RAM
99U5428-046.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 388 samples	1x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	1x
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQG 1x4GBSmartBench 27%, 2,672 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $259

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359