Toshiba Satellite C50-A569

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C50-A569 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PT10S
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131120
Uptime	9 Days
Run Date	Feb 27 '22 at 19:59
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39 33,019 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 89.6 1-Core 85.3 2-Core 152 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 227 31% 229 Pts	64-Core 227 14% 227 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 710M 2,241 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA36) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	3.51% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 8.3 Parallax 1.2 3% 4.53 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 4.4 4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.51% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 211GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX0A4M SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 85 77 96 96 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 104 Write 102 Mixed 32.9 SusWrite 86.4 59% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KN2M64-ETB 1x8GB 4,781 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 8.8 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 10.3 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C50-A569 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C50-A569

CPU
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	7x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	4x
GeForce 710MNvidiaBench 3%, 2,241 samples	3x

SSD
SSDPR-CX400-128 128GBBench 67%, 1,355 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
WDS500G2B0A 500GBWDCBench 98%, 24,830 samples	1x

RAM
KN2M64-ETB 1x8GBKingstonBench 28%, 4,781 samples	2x
4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 6GBMicronBench 42%, 151 samples	2x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GBMicronBench 48%, 844 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $39

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16