Gigabyte GA-P15FV2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P15FV2  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime16.6 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 19:49
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$46
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 98
2-Core 184
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 506
52% 421 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 6501) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 6.7
3% 8.97 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
512gb QLC SATA SSD 512GB
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0918A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 159 46 129 25 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 420
Write 17.2
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 84.8
32% 150 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 20
DQ Mixed 0.4
21% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSK64W6H 1315 CT51264BC1339.M16F 12GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 13.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P15FV2 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P15FV2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $46
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback