Asus M11AD

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 24 months ago, 23 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus M11AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M11AD
Memory	9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140319
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 27 '22 at 19:15
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440S-$118 3,990 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 90.9 2-Core 176 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 327 44% 325 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 8597) ≥ 4GB CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.98 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	6.78% Terrible	Lighting 7.9 Reflection 11.6 Parallax 9.5 6% 9.67 fps	MRender 8.2 Gravity 10.6 Splatting 8.6 7% 9.13 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.78% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: XA003R17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 98 186 108 175 100 MB/s Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.2% Good	Read 255 Write 234 Mixed 218 SusWrite 148 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 34.5 123% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 184 137% 180 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 99%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 462GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 117 115 115 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 112 Write 101 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 115 64% 89.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SLB304G08-GGNHM Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.1% Good	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 18.4 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 19.9 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M11AD Builds (Compare 494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M11AD

CPU
Core i7-4770SIntel $112Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	119x
Core i5-4440SIntel $118Bench 67%, 3,990 samples	101x
Core i5-4460SIntelBench 66%, 10,941 samples	47x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	62x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	45x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x

RAM
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 954 samples	30x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	16x
MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GBAdataBench 31%, 1,606 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $152

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16