Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-A  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 10:46
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 236
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 674
67% 546 Pts
64-Core 665
41% 665 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.73% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 8.8
6% 8.33 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 7
Splatting 11.9
8% 9.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.73%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 256GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS0328D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 211 243 202 262 260 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 1,368
Write 392
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 237
112% 520 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 37.4
107% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 60.8
DQ Mixed 96.2
78% 115 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 109%
Great: 277%
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
195GB free
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 882 546 207 207 207 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,233
Write 962
Mixed 946
SusWrite 376
196% 879 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 72.8
251% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 480
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 548
441% 609 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 179%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RGX2-16G3000A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.9% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 19.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 21.4
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $828
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback