Asus EB1033

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus EB1033  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK EB1033
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 05:02
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom D2700-$96
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
28% Poor
Memory 51.7
1-Core 8.1
2-Core 15.7
21% 25.2 Pts
4-Core 27.7
8-Core 28.4
4% 28 Pts
64-Core 28.5
2% 28.5 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 610M
Asus(1043 8536) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 295.93
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
2.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.37 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 2.1
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.24%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U21010RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 185
Write 168
Mixed 158
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 14.8
65% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 78.9
67% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160BJ.C 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
14% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 3.6
13% 4.5 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14%
Great: 14%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EB1033 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus EB1033

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback