Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 03:06
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 115
2-Core 207
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 651
66% 535 Pts
64-Core 858
53% 858 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.8% Good
Lighting 93
Reflection 124
Parallax 77
76% 98.1 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 77.4
Splatting 70
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P200 256GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1206A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 129 68 43 78 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 487
Write 417
Mixed 395
SusWrite 100
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 27.1
117% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 43.3
94% 186 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 98%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
126GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 110 106 107 109 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 115
Write 101
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 107
66% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.4% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 25.6
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 19.1
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback