Asus CM5671

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus CM5671  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM5671
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100416
Uptime3 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '22 at 23:44
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5500
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 84.1
40% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 90.1
8-Core 86
12% 88.1 Pts
64-Core 88.2
6% 88.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1083) 2GB
CLim: 1151 MHz, MLim: 550 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.77% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 10.4
7% 8.53 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 9.4
Splatting 10.1
7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.77%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 250GB SSD
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 142 123 58 54 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.2% Below average
Read 222
Write 139
Mixed 151
SusWrite 91.3
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 16.4
61% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 17.8
DQ Mixed 20.2
16% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 105%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
38GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 24 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 28
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 24.4
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM5671 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM5671

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback