bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory31.2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.2GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory17.9 GB free of 31.25 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1114 x 683 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime8.6 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '22 at 22:32
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 49.8
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 115
43% 74.2 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 433
39% 329 Pts
64-Core 670
41% 670 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 43GB
11GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 656
Write 267
Mixed 657
117% 527 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 13.4
46% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 44.9
DQ Write 43
DQ Mixed 20.3
22% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 77%
Vmware Virtual disk 268GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.7% Terrible
Read 4.3
Write 3
Mixed 4
SusWrite 1.5
2% 3.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 1.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 31GB
null MHz
16384, 8192, 4096, 2048, 1024, 256 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.2% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.8
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback