Hp-pavilion WC846AA-ABE HPE-140es

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Hp-pavilion WC846AA-ABE HPE-140es (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI IONA
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100625
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '22 at 21:51
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$320 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 84.3 2-Core 159 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 345 36% 289 Pts	64-Core 344 21% 344 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250 11,945 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0753) 1.8GB Ram: 1.8GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	5.86% Terrible	Lighting 8.1 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 3.7 7% 7.77 fps	MRender 7.9 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 2.9 4% 5.77 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.86% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
240G 120GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: O1230C SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 122 64 75 73 72 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.6% Average	Read 238 Write 230 Mixed 217 SusWrite 106 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 19.2 66% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 177 135% 182 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 48%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 85GB free Firmware: 1AJ10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 78 79 78 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 70.3 Write 93.5 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 78.4 55% 75.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 9801 99U5474-028.A00LF 2C802C80 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 9801 99U5474-028.A00LF 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.8% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 12.5 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 12.4 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WC846AA-ABE HPE-140es Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Hp-pavilion WC846AA-ABE HPE-140es

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	2x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	2x
240G 120GBBench 47%, 3 samples	1x

RAM
9905403-400.A00LF 4x4GBUnknownBench 41%, 16 samples	2x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBCE80CE80Bench 39%, 417 samples	1x
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GBFE02FE02Bench 38%, 699 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $457

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16