HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80BC
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '22 at 01:45
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 99.6
52% 80.4 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 162
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 80BC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 6.1
3% 5.53 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 6
4% 5.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 405
Mixed 308
78% 357 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 25.1
102% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 186
165% 245 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Kingston 16GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 16
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback