Asus M4N72-E

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4N72-E (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20110414
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '22 at 19:46
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 78.8 1-Core 60.1 2-Core 120 54% 86.5 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 237 32% 236 Pts	64-Core 235 14% 235 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3615) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1356 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.98 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Lighting 32.1 Reflection 31 Parallax 41.7 26% 34.9 fps	MRender 42.8 Gravity 41.5 Splatting 34.3 32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03190003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 167 110 50 45 41 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.6% Average	Read 247 Write 175 Mixed 166 SusWrite 89.8 38% 169 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 36.8 4K Mixed 25.4 91% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 94.4 DQ Write 44.1 DQ Mixed 51.9 43% 63.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 100%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 284GB free Firmware: 12.01B02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 74 72 72 66 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 73.4 Write 65.3 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 68.9 48% 64.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.2% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 9.8 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 7 20% 6.9 GB/s	Latency 82.8 48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4N72-E Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N72-E

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	2x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	5x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	2x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	5x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	3x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $432

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16