Asrock X99 Professional

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Professional  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '22 at 18:13
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 87
2-Core 169
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 710
60% 517 Pts
64-Core 1416
88% 1416 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.2% Above average
Lighting 79.9
Reflection 66.9
Parallax 108
65% 84.8 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 81.1
Splatting 40.6
48% 60.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 558 562 561 554 591 621 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,277
Write 1,190
Mixed 740
SusWrite 574
211% 945 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 48.1
156% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 554
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 514
373% 488 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 156%
Great: 241%
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GB
464GB free
Firmware: EXA73H2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1800 910 613 614 614 614 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,973
Write 1915
Mixed 1,360
SusWrite 861
342% 1,527 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 70.3
234% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 735
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 608
447% 592 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 230%
Great: 276%
PNY SSD2SC240G1CS1754D117-820 240GB
155GB free
Firmware: CS111101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 171 171 187 199 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 372
Write 279
Mixed 252
SusWrite 179
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 29.8
112% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 174
158% 240 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 87%
Patriot Burst 480GB
360GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 167 167 166 110 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 447
Write 266
Mixed 321
SusWrite 142
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 30.7
119% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 187
166% 247 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
226GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 88 87 89 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 87.3
Write 13.2
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 87
43% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 59%
WD Re 2TB-$35
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01D01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 145 145 146 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 142
Write 143
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 144
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 83%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
2TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 137 140 144 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 152
Write 134
Mixed 116
SusWrite 139
100% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3750640NS 43W7575 42D0003IBM 750GB
373GB free
Firmware: 3.AEP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 62 68 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 56.9
Write 56
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 65.6
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MRX4U266GHHF8G 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 53
MC Write 42.5
MC Mixed 42.6
132% 46 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 19.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 115%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Professional Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Professional

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $829
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback