Positivo VJFE42F11X-XXXXXX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPositivo VJFE42F11X-XXXXXX  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJFE-CL V2
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '22 at 11:33
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 127
2-Core 228
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 373
51% 379 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8336
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 7.7
5% 6.63 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 11.2
7% 8.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CL1-8D512 512GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E990903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 163 256 285 229 259 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,610
Write 452
Mixed 640
SusWrite 248
161% 737 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 21.2
132% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 417
DQ Write 589
DQ Mixed 321
294% 442 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 140%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD4S3200316G22-B 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.9% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 13.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VJFE42F11X-XXXXXX Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJFE42F11X-XXXXXX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback