LG 13Z990-R.AAS7U1Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLG 13Z990-R.AAS7U1Z  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 13Z990
Memory13.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 20:54
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 56.4
2-Core 117
48% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 375
37% 303 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Device(1854 0331) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 6.2
6% 6.8 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 11.7
8% 9.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SA530 SDASN8Y256G1009 256GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40101009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 215 217 215 216 219 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 364
Write 342
Mixed 309
SusWrite 218
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 14.2
59% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 260
210% 299 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15S4/16G MEM-DOWN 24GB
2667, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.2% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18.9
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 13Z990-R.AAS7U1Z Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: LG 13Z990-R.AAS7U1Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback