Acer TravelMate P648-G2-MG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TravelMate P648-G2-MG  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL BAD40_KL
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 20:17
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 90.2
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 99.3
56% 85.4 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 161
20% 155 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 117D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4815
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.63% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 6.6
5% 8.03 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.2
7% 7.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.63%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 201 238 251 251 250 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 355
Write 257
Mixed 202
SusWrite 238
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 14.7
62% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 183
173% 272 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3AZ Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 19.9
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 12
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P648-G2-MG Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P648-G2-MG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback