_com1_ NBINF-M7-5R7R6N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System_com1_ NBINF-M7-5R7R6N  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard GM7ZN0M
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 19:59
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 143
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 669
65% 533 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Device(1D05 1111) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.36
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.87% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 13.1
8% 12.1 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 22
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.87%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HALB-00000 1TB
732GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 925 967 862 928 959 953 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,160
Write 966
Mixed 918
SusWrite 932
223% 994 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 48.5
151% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 573
DQ Write 407
DQ Mixed 502
372% 494 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 173%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 15.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 18.3
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NBINF-M7-5R7R6N Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: _com1_ NBINF-M7-5R7R6N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback