Acer TravelMate P648-G2-MG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TravelMate P648-G2-MG  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL BAD40_KL
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 12:31
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 136
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 217
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 117D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4815
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.57% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 6.7
5% 7.47 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.2
7% 7.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.57%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 236 248 248 254 255 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 402
Write 249
Mixed 201
SusWrite 242
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 25.2
108% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 182
171% 268 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3AZ Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
64.3% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 20.6
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P648-G2-MG Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P648-G2-MG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback