Google Compute Engine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory85GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 85GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGoogle Compute Engine  (all builds)
MotherboardGoogle Google Compute Engine
Memory79 GB free of 85 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 10:47
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 142
54% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 502
46% 387 Pts
64-Core 896
55% 896 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Google PersistentDisk 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 144 177 118 120 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 596
Write 194
Mixed 301
SusWrite 148
68% 310 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 9.2
38% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 110
92% 134 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 53%
Google PersistentDisk 215GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 145 176 119 120 192 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 85GB
null MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 5120 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 49.2
MC Mixed 38.5
122% 42.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compute Engine Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Google Compute Engine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback