MSI DKA790GX Platinum (MS-7550)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7550
MotherboardMSI DKA790GX Platinum (MS-7550)  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '17 at 10:11
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 58.5
2-Core 118
57% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 235
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 235
15% 235 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D7) 2GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1770 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 26.4
Parallax 31.1
28% 30.6 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 31.4
Splatting 33.1
28% 34.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 208
Write 159
Mixed 167
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 11
57% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 25.7
DQ Mixed 9.53
11% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 36%
Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
920GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 79.2
Mixed 61.8
59% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.21
81% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 12
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DKA790GX Platinum (MS-7550) Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI DKA790GX Platinum (MS-7550)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback