Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_F515JF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_F515JF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515JF
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210603
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '22 at 17:36
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 226
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 537
61% 478 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
Asus(1043 1EFF) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7186
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 12.7
11% 13 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 10.1
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 90 58 55 59 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,387
Write 915
Mixed 852
SusWrite 120
181% 819 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 65.3
225% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 475
DQ Mixed 344
277% 385 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 151%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.1
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_F515JF Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_F515JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback